NFL

No Explanation Needed

Posted on

120216-charlamagne-tha-god-kal-1080x608

Over the past 18 months Americans and citizens around the world have gotten a chance to see just how divided the United States is on certain issues. The knockdown, drag out 2016 presidential election between Hillary Clinton and the victor Donald Trump inspired some scary rhetoric from some scary places. One public figure that hopped on the Trump train after he secured the Republican nomination for president was conservative commentator Tomi Lahren.

Lahren’s online show on TheBlaze has gone viral because of her inflammatory quotes on current social issues. Lahren has compared the Black Lives Matter movement to the Klu Klux Klan. During NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick’s in game protests of societal injustices, Lahren recommended that Kaepernick go somewhere else if he is not satisfied with America. Lahren has also suggested that Beyonce hates police after her most recent Super Bowl performance, criticized actor Jesse Williams for his outrage at the murder of unarmed black men and repeatedly denounced President Obama’s handling of national security issues.

Those are only a few of the misinformed and irresponsible things Lahren has said on her non-televised online show. However, now Lahren’s ideals have been spread to the masses through her appearance on Comedy Central’s The Daily Show with Trevor Noah and a meeting she had with The Breakfast Club host Charlemagne Tha God. Even though Noah and Charlemagne do not agree with any of Lahren’s views, the question must be asked if it is even worth the time and exposure to have a conversation with her.

Jay Z once stated, “a wise man told me don’t argue with fools, cause people from a distance can’t tell who is who”. Lahren is the fool is this instance. Charlemagne and Noah are the ones we are confused about.

Lahren has no plans to retract statements that encourage divisiveness and offend the marginalized population of this country. The idea that conversation is necessary to understand different view points to spark unity does not apply in this case.

Having a conversation with Lahren about the plight of black and brown people in America is like trying to figure out why Lil Kim had all that plastic surgery. You will get the details from the doctor, but never fully understand why.

The worst part of this Lahren exposure is that it has been on her terms. After Lahren’s appearance on The Daily Show she was scheduled to appear on The Breakfast Club with Charlamagne but canceled and opted for an off air meeting. Even after Charlamagne appeared on her internet show through a horrible Skype connection a few months ago.

For some people and some viewpoints, there is no conversation that can be had that will lead to a positive outcome. Noah and Charlamagne may be genuinely attempting to understand her motivation for saying the things that she does or they may be trying to pop in her Google searches and expand their brand. In any case, it is borderline irresponsible to legitimize the opinions of anyone who profits from the division of American citizens.

The Derrick Rose Dilemma

Posted on Updated on

derrick-rose-lawsuit-basketball

New York Knicks guard Derrick Rose and a group of friends were recently found not guilty in a highly publicized civil rape case. Rose and two friends were accused by an ex-girlfriend of Rose’s of taking advantage of her while she was intoxicated. According to court documents, the woman invited Rose over to her apartment a few weeks after Rose had ended their relationship with a text message. A few hours later Rose and his two friends arrived and engaged in sexual activity with the woman.

The woman, who chose to remain anonymous, contends that she was too intoxicated (and may have been drugged) to consent to sex with all three. In this civil trail, the woman and her attorneys were seeking $20 million in damages.

Like in many rape cases, the details and accusations are very disturbing. However, the most disturbing comments and ideology may have come from Rose himself. Regardless of his guilt or innocence, Rose’s idea of sexual consent needs to be re-examined.

This all seems a bit fishy when you consider that when asked in his deposition if he had an understanding of the word “consent,” Rose replied “No, but can you tell me?” – Complex.com

During the trial Rose defended himself by stating that the racy texts he exchanged with his ex-girlfriend confirmed sexual consent. He also believes that the woman’s sexual history confirmed sexual consent. A lot of the testimony discrediting the plaintiff  amounts to victim shaming.

Rose’s obvious ignorance when it comes to the definition of consent is scary. Also, his verbiage during the course of this civil trial makes it really hard to root for him this NBA season. Sports fans have had to wrestle with their morals a lot in the past year.

Last NFL season, football fans had to watch Greg Hardy suit up on Sundays with some horrible accusations hanging over his head. An ex-girlfriend of Hardy’s accused him of choking her, throwing her onto a couch of loaded assault rifles and threatening to kill her if she told the media about it.

After serving a lengthy NFL suspension, Hardy suited up for the Dallas Cowboys last year. Cowboys fans were torn between their love for their hometown team and their hate for the alleged actions of Hardy. Hardy’s baggage and diminished skills have him employed this season.

Another example playing out this NFL season includes New York Giants kicker Josh Brown. Brown:

Giants kicker Josh Brown admitted to physically and emotionally abusing his wife and called himself a sex-addicted “deviant” who viewed himself as “God” and his wife as “my slave”, according to entries in his own journals, emails to his wife, and a letter he wrote to friends, which were obtained by SNY – Sny.tv

The New York Giants have not commented on these discoveries from Brown’s journal. The next logical step would be to release Brown so that he can get the counseling and help he needs.

Although all three cases are very different, Rose, Hardy and Brown call into question whether or not an athletes treatment of women should affect their ability to earn such a lucrative living on a public platform. Also, as fans, how do we separate the athlete/team from the man.

In particular, Rose is in his first season playing for a Knicks team desperate to improve from last season’s 32-50 record. Rose’s ability to help a team win has never been in question (while healthy). However, each time he takes the court this season, his judgment and character will be.